HEALTH IN MIDDLESBROUGH
- Julius Owhe
- Mar 23
- 3 min read

Reframing Health Through a Doughnut Economics Lens
Traditional health metrics tell us what is happening—life expectancy gaps, obesity rates, physical inactivity. But they rarely explain why these patterns persist or how they connect to broader economic and ecological systems.
Using the Doughnut Economics framework, we can visualize Middlesbrough's health challenge as a system operating outside the "safe and just space for humanity." This approach, developed by economist Kate Raworth and operationalized through tools like the Biological Inequities Index (BII) from Centric Lab, reveals health as an outcome of systemic factors rather than individual choices.

The Biological Inequities Index: Measuring Systemic Health
Current Score: 13.6 out of 20
(68% of maximum possible inequality)
Threshold for Safe & Just Space: 0
The BII measures how biological inequality manifests across populations based on environmental and social exposures. Unlike traditional health metrics that focus on outcomes, the BII captures the systemic drivers that create health disparities.
What this means for Middlesbrough:
A score of 13.6 indicates a significant social foundation shortfall
We are operating far below the minimum standard for population health
The "doughnut hole"—the gap between current reality and the social foundation—is substantial
Against a threshold of 0 (representing biological equity), Middlesbrough is far from the desired result. This isn't a failure of healthcare provision; it's evidence of structural inequality embedded in our economic and social systems.
The Data: Where We Stand
Life Expectancy Crisis
Males: 75.4 years (Middlesbrough) vs 79.3 years (national) — 3.9-year gap
Females: 79.8 years (Middlesbrough) vs 83.1 years (national) — 3.3-year gap
Physical Activity Deficit
Only 56.5% of adults meet activity guidelines vs 67.3% nationally
10.8 percentage point gap10.8 percentage point gap represents thousands of residents missing protective physical activity.
Obesity & Overweight
Rates exceed national averages for both children and adults
Creating intergenerational health burdens and reduced healthy life expectance
The Doughnut Framework: Two Boundaries
1. The Social Foundation (Inner Boundary)
The BII score of 13.6 shows we've fallen into the "doughnut hole"—failing to meet the minimum social foundation for health. This includes:
Economic security (poverty reduction)
Housing quality (warm, safe homes)
Education access (foundations for life)
Environmental quality (clean air, green spaces)
Employment security (decent work)
Social inclusion (community connection)
2. The Ecological Ceiling (Outer Boundary)
While our immediate crisis is the social shortfall, we must also ensure health improvements don't breach planetary boundaries:
Green space protection (mental health, physical activity)
Air quality (respiratory health)
Sustainable food systems (nutrition)
Waste reduction (environmental health)
The "safe and just space" lies between these boundaries where all residents have the resources needed for health without exceeding environmental limits.
Systemic Drivers: Beyond Individual Behavior
The BII reveals three interconnected layers:
Systemic Causes (Structural)
Economic inequality and poverty
Poor housing quality and affordability
Limited educational access and attainment
Environmental degradation
Employment insecurity
Social exclusion and discrimination
Intermediate Factors (Mechanisms)
Chronic stress from financial insecurity
Limited healthcare access and quality
Poor nutrition (food deserts, affordability)
Physical inactivity (unsafe environments, lack of facilities)
Social isolation
Environmental toxin exposure
Health Outcomes (Manifestations)
Reduced life expectancy
Chronic disease prevalence
Poor mental health
Obesity epidemic
Infant mortality disparities
Intergenerational health inequality
The 2024-2027 Action Plan: Moving Toward the Safe & Just Space
Middlesbrough Council's response recognizes that health is created outside the clinic—in homes, schools, workplaces, and communities.
The Family Hub Model: Foundation of Change
Rather than treating health as a medical issue, Family Hubs address the social determinants where they intersect with family life:
Prevention & Early Detection: Catching issues before they become crises
Best Start in Life: Ensuring children develop strong foundations
School Readiness: Breaking the link between disadvantage and educational attainment
Resilience Building: Supporting families to thrive, not just survive
Public Health Strategy: Structural Intervention
Working with partners to address the root causes identified in the BII:
Disease prevention through population-level interventions
Early detection reducing late-stage treatment burden
Acting on structural factors: housing, employment, environment
Promoting wellbeing across all council services
Green Strategy: Ecological & Health Co-Benefits
Protecting the ecological ceiling while improving health:
Recycling rates: Reducing environmental harm
Green space protection: Mental health and physical activity opportunities
Environmental stewardship: Community ownership of local spaces
From Measurement to Action
The BII score of 13.6 isn't a label—it's a baseline. The 2024-2027 Action Plan represents our trajectory toward the safe and just space:
Target: Reduce BII toward 0 (biological equity)
Approach: Systemic intervention, not symptom management
Partnership: Health creation requires cross-sector collaboration
Equity: Focusing resources where need is greatest
The Path Forward
Doughnut Economics teaches us that endless growth isn't the goal—meeting human needs within planetary boundaries is. For Middlesbrough, this means:
Closing the social foundation gap through poverty reduction, housing improvement, and educational investment
Respecting ecological limits through sustainable practices and green space protection
Measuring what matters—tracking BII and life expectancy gaps, not just healthcare activity
Building regenerative systems that improve health without depleting community or environmental resources
The question isn't whether we can afford to invest in health equity.
The Biological Inequities Index shows we cannot afford not to.


Comments